Tag Archive for: 2024 general election ballot measures

Mixed Results for Ballot Propositions Transform Supported

Most people have been focused on the results of last week’s presidential election, so it can be easy to miss the results of state and local ballot measures that could be consequential. Transform endorsed several state and local measures that will move forward our agenda for transit and housing equity and climate resilience. It wasn’t all good news, especially at the state level, but there is still a lot to celebrate.

California proposition results: some hope in an atmosphere of anxiety

California showed the complexity of its political landscape in the results for propositions on the November ballot. Voters added the right to same-sex marriage to the state constitution but supported a punitive anti-crime measure and refused to outlaw forced labor in prisons. The measures Transform supported at the state level faced the same fate, with a mix of positive and disappointing results.

A win for climate

Proposition 4, a $10 billion bond to fund climate change mitigation projects, passed with 58.9% support. This measure is a fraction of the amount California needs to spend on making our communities more climate-resilient, but it shows that Californians understand the seriousness of climate change and are willing to invest in mitigation measures. 

We see this vote as an affirmation of our mission to ensure underserved communities can live healthy lives, free from fear of climate catastrophe.

Losses for housing

The failure of Proposition 5, which would have reduced the percentage of votes needed to pass local bonds for affordable housing and other public infrastructure from two-thirds to 55%, is a setback. Regional Measure 4, a $10 billion Bay Area housing bond, was pulled from the ballot before the election because backers feared it wouldn’t get enough support to pass. If Prop 5 had passed, RM 4 could pass on a future ballot with 55%. Transform and our allies will continue to campaign for this vital affordable housing measure, but the path to victory just got a bit steeper.

Additionally, Proposition 33 failed and the related Proposition 34 passed. Both Prop 33 and Prop 34 received a lot of media attention and heavy advertising, causing confusion among voters and highlighting the influence of special interest groups.

Prop 33 would have repealed the restrictive and outdated Costa-Hawkins Act and allowed California cities and towns to determine the best local rent control regulations. With the failure of Prop 33, communities are still hamstrung in their efforts to protect existing affordable housing stock by the restrictive state law, which prevents rent control on homes built after 1995, condos, and single-family homes. 

Proposition 34, which restricted spending of a single charity, AIDS Healthcare Foundation, narrowly passed. Transform opposed this bill as it was written by special interest groups trying to limit the housing related advocacy efforts of the AIDS Healthcare Foundation.

California voters are usually more savvy, rejecting efforts by special interest groups to sway their vote, but in 2024, the message appears to have landed.

Local ballot measures include landmark victories

Transform supported local ballot measures relating to transit, housing, active transportation, and open space in several Bay Area communities. Voters concurred with Transform’s endorsements on local ballot measures everywhere except the North Bay, where all but one of the measures we endorsed went the opposite way.

San Francisco ballot measures

San Francisco voters supported community amenities, safety, car-free spaces, and transit.

  • Prop B: Transform supported this bond measure to fund community health centers, shelter beds, and street and sidewalk safety. It needed a two-thirds majority to pass, and it made that with a comfortable margin.
  • Prop G: Transform supported this affordable housing funding measure, which passed with more than 55% voting yes.
  • Prop K: Transform supported this ballot measure to permanently turn a stretch of the Great Highway near Ocean Beach into a car-free bicycle and pedestrian path. It has passed by an 8% margin, showing strong support for more car-free spaces.
  • Prop L: Transform endorsed this funding measure to tax ride-hail operators and use the money to fund the city’s Muni public transit system, which is struggling to preserve services amid a funding crisis. The measure passed by more than 13%, showing significant support for transit funding. However, because Prop M gained a larger percentage of votes, Prop L will not be implemented. Prop M is set to overhaul how business taxes are implemented and, therefore, negates Prop L’s proposed new tax structure.

East Bay ballot measures

East Bay voters supported funding for active transportation infrastructure and stronger tenant protections.

Albany 

  • Measure C: Transform supported this local measure to levy a tax to provide funding for sidewalk and path improvements. It passed with almost 70% of the vote.

Berkeley

  • Measures BB and CC: Transform supported BB to expand tenant protections and opposed CC to limit tenants’ rights. If both measures had passed, the one with the most votes would have gone into effect. However, voters decisively rejected Measure CC, and Measure BB is ahead in the vote count and appears headed for victory.
  • Measures EE and FF: These two competing measures to fund safe streets would also implement the one with the most votes if both passed. Transform supported the stronger measure, FF, and opposed EE. Voters agreed, passing FF and voting down EE.
  • Measure W: Transform supported this parcel tax to fund homeless services, and so did Berkeley voters.

South Bay ballot measures

  • East Palo Alto Measure JJ: Transform supported this measure to fund rental assistance and affordable housing preservation. Voters supported it overwhelmingly, with more than 76% in favor.

North Bay ballot measures

The North Bay followed a statewide trend opposing tenant protections but supported a measure limiting sprawl.

Fairfax

  • Measure I: A strong majority supported this measure to repeal existing eviction and rent stabilization laws. Transform opposed this measure.
  • Measure J: Transform supported this bond measure for infrastructure improvements such as crosswalks and protected bike lanes. If approved, it would have allowed Fairfax to qualify for millions of dollars in federal grants, but it needed a two-thirds majority to pass and got less than 50% support.

Larkspur

  • Measure K: Transform supported this grassroots initiative to bring rent control to Larkspur, but voters rejected it by a large majority.

Petaluma

  • Measure Y: Petaluma residents supported this measure, which Transform endorsed, to reduce sprawl and preserve farmland with an urban growth boundary.

San Anselmo

  • Measures N and O: Transform supported two measures to bring rent control to San Anselmo and affirm existing tenant protections in the city. However, voters rejected both measures by wide margins.

Transform 2024 Ballot Proposition Guide

Climate crisis mitigation, affordable housing, public transportation, and racial equity are all on the November 2024 ballot. Below, we offer Transform’s positions on relevant propositions and measures that move our mission forward and help move the needle on these crucial, urgent issues. This guide includes statewide measures and local ballot initiatives in each region of the Bay Area.

As a 501(c)3, Transform can take positions on ballot measures but cannot endorse candidates. We worked with the Transbay Coalition and other allies to gather candidate questionnaires on sustainable transportation. You can find links to the questionnaires here.

How to vote

You can confirm your voter registration and track your ballot in the mail. You can also sign up for text alerts to find out when your county election office processes your ballot. As a reminder, you have until Tuesday, November 5, to turn it back in or vote in person.

Important dates to keep in mind:


Short list of Transform positions on ballot propositions


Statewide

Yes on Prop 4

Yes on Prop 5

Yes on Prop 33

No on Prop 34

Local

SAN FRANCISCO
Yes on Prop B
Yes on Prop G
Yes on Prop K
Yes on Prop L
SOUTH BAY
Yes on East Palo Alto Measure JJ
Yes on San Mateo City Measure T
EAST BAY
Yes on Albany Measure C
Yes on Berkeley Measure BB
No on Berkeley Measure CC
No on Berkeley Measure EE
Yes on Berkeley Measure FF
Yes on Berkeley Measure W
NORTH BAY
No on Fairfax Measure I
Yes on Fairfax Measure J
Yes on Larkspur Measure K
Yes on Petaluma Measure Y
Yes on San Anselmo Measure N
Yes on San Anselmo Measure O

Detailed breakdown of Transform’s ballot measure positions


STATEWIDE

  • Yes on Prop 4: $10 billion for climate crisis mitigation
    • Transform officially endorsed the Yes on Prop 4 Campaign early on. Prop 4 will make urgent investments in proven solutions for mitigating the deadly and destructive impact of the climate crisis. Without clean air and drinking water, people can not walk, bike, and roll safely. Vote yes on Prop 4. Supported by the California Green New Deal Coalition.
  • Yes on Prop 5: Lower the approval threshold needed for funding affordable housing and public infrastructure
    • Transform officially endorsed the Yes on Prop 5 Campaign early on as well. Prop 5 will lower the voter approval threshold from 66% to 55% on housing and public infrastructure bonds. We urgently need to lower the systemic barriers to building new affordable housing and safer street infrastructure and this bond achieves that goal. Supported by Urban Habitat, Bike East Bay, East Bay Housing Organizations, and the California Green New Deal Coalition, among others. Vote yes on Prop 5, and please tell your friends to vote yes as well — this measure is crucial to allowing California communities to build a brighter future.
  • Yes on Prop 33: Remove limits on cities’ ability to adjust rent control regulations
    • Voting Yes on Prop 33 repeals the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act of 1995. The Act currently prohibits municipalities’ ability to adjust rent control policies such as imposing rent control on new developments built after 1995. Prop 33 will also prohibit the state from passing future restrictions. The proposition does not impose any rent control provision but merely frees local jurisdictions to enact renter protections that work in their communities. While rent control alone is not the ultimate panacea for our region’s housing crisis, it is an important tool that has improved the material conditions of the most vulnerable communities by protecting them from displacement. Supported by East Bay Housing Organizations and the California Green New Deal Coalition
  • No on Prop 34: Restrict how the AIDS Healthcare Foundation can spend funds
    • This proposition targets a single entity: the AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF). The organization has taken strong positions on tenant protections, earning the ire of the real estate industry. The requirements in this measure that nonprofit healthcare providers spend more on patient care might seem reasonable, but the qualifications written into the measure would apply to only one organization: AHF. It’s an attempt to stop AHF’s housing advocacy, and whether or not you agree with the organization’s positions, it’s a misuse of the proposition system that should not be rewarded with support. Opposed by East Bay Housing Organizations and the California Green New Deal Coalition. Vote No on Prop 34.

SAN FRANCISCO

  • Yes on Prop B: Funding for safer streets and shelter
    • This bond measure would provide funding for public amenities, including community health centers, street and sidewalk safety, and more shelter or interim housing space. Supported by the San Francisco Bicycle Coalition because of the funding for infrastructure improvements. Vote yes on Prop B. 
  • Yes on Prop G: City funding to keep rental units affordable
    • This would amend San Francisco’s charter and require the city to make annual contributions to an Affordable Housing Opportunity Fund for Seniors, Families, and Persons with Disabilities. The city already provides supplemental payments to landlords to create affordable housing units. We urgently need more, and this dedicated funding will help ensure San Francisco maintains affordable rentals. Vote yes on Prop G.
  • Yes on Prop K: Convert Upper Great Highway from a road into a park for people
    • Prop K will create a permanent car-free space on the Upper Great Highway by Ocean Beach, allowing a safer and more joyful experience for people enjoying San Francisco’s shoreline. Advocates have fought hard for this critical amenity since a COVID-era closure was rescinded. Supported by the San Francisco Bicycle Coalition. Vote yes on Prop K.
  • Yes on Prop L: Tax ride-hail and autonomous vehicle businesses to fund crucial transit operations
    • SFMTA is facing an existential crisis due to a lack of funding. Prop L would contribute an estimated $25 million to critical transit operations, preserving Muni services and allowing people with disabilities, low-income families, and older adults to continue to travel around the region. Supported by Urban Habitat and the San Francisco Bicycle Coalition. Vote yes on L.

EAST BAY:

  • Yes on Albany Measure C: Approve tax funding for sidewalks and pathways
    • More funding is urgently needed that is specifically dedicated to safer street infrastructure. Supported by Bike East Bay. Vote yes on Measure C.
  • Yes on Berkeley Measure BB: Fund housing retention programs and expand tenant protections
    • This measure, supported by Berkeley renters and the city’s Rent Control Board, strengthens renter protections and lowers the cap on rent increases. Urban Habitat joins us in supporting a yes vote on Measure BB.
  • No on Berkeley Measure CC: Limit and change tenant protections
    • The mirror image of Measure BB, CC raises the cap on rent increases slightly and limits the power of Berkeley’s Rent Control Board. Urban Habitat urges a no vote on Measure CC and so do we.

*If both Berkeley Measures BB and CC pass, the measure with the most votes will win.

  • No on Berkeley Measure EE: Competing with Measure FF with less funding, no guarantees for safer street infrastructure
    • Measure EE is in direct contention with Measure FF. Transform encourages you to vote no on Measure EE as it does not include a guaranteed dedicated revenue for safer street infrastructure and would also bring in less funding than Measure FF. We need to push for maximum funding for safe streets, not settle for potential scraps that are subject to political will. Bike East Bay opposes this measure. Vote no on Measure EE.
  • Yes on Berkeley Measure FF: Parcel tax to fund safer streets for all
    • Measure FF is a proposed Berkeley parcel tax of 17¢ per lot square foot residential and 25¢ commercial that will fund paving activities across the city and require bike/walk plan implementation to ensure that smoother streets don’t just lead to more speeding. Bike East Bay supports this measure. Vote yes on Measure FF.

*If both Berkeley Measures EE and FF pass, the measure with the most votes will win.

  • Yes on Berkeley Measure W: Parcel taxes to support homeless services
    • In 2018, Berkeley voters adopted Measure P, which raised the transfer tax on properties sold for over $1.5 million, with the revenue going to support homeless services. Measure W changes the formula. The tax increase, from 1.5% to 2.5% starts at $1.6 million and the rate increases progressively for higher-dollar real estate transactions. Supported by East Bay Housing Organizations. Vote yes on Measure W. 

SOUTH BAY:

  • Yes on East Palo Alto Measure JJ:
    • This measure would divert revenue collected from an existing 2.5% tax on gross receipts from a general fund to instead go towards rental assistance for tenants and other types of housing assistance such as affordable home ownership, affordable housing preservation, protecting residents from displacement or homelessness, and administrative expenses. The San Mateo Anti-Displacement Coalition and Urban Habitat support this measure. Vote Yes on Measure JJ.
  • Yes on San Mateo City Measure T: Allow San Mateo to build more housing by Caltrain and along key corridors like El Camino Real
    • A great opportunity to rebuke outdated zoning and build more housing near transit, a key strategy to curbing intersectional climate and housing crises.

NORTH BAY:

  • No on Fairfax Measure I: 
    • This measure would repeal Fairfax’s current Just Cause Eviction Ordinance and Rent Stabilization Ordinance passed in 2022 and replace it with the state standards put forth in the Contra-Hawkins Rental Housing Act. Opposition includes Canal Alliance, Public Advocates, Urban Habitat, and Tenants Together. Vote no on Measure I.
  • Yes on Fairfax Measure J: 
    • This measure would allow for investment in safer street infrastructure, with dedicated investment in protected bike lanes and safer crosswalks by schools. This funding would also unlock millions in additional federal grant support needed to continue to design and build safer streets for all roadway users. Supported by Public Advocates. Vote yes on Measure J.
  • Yes on Larkspur Measure K: Establish rent control in Larkspur
    • Grassroots organizing brought this measure to the ballot. It will cap rent increases at 3%, or 60% of inflation — whichever is lower — and establishes other tenant rights. Supported by Urban Habitat and Public Advocates. Vote yes on Measure K.
  • Yes on Petaluma Measure Y: Extend Petaluma’s urban growth boundary
    • This measure preserves farmland and encourages the kind of dense, infill development the North Bay needs to combat climate change. Sprawl is a major driver of climate-killing emissions; vote yes on Measure Y.
  • Yes on San Anselmo Measure N: Establish rent control in San Anselmo
    • This measure caps rent increases for buildings with three units or more at 60% of inflation or 5%, whichever is less. Supported by Urban Habitat and Public Advocates. Vote yes on Measure N.
  • Yes on San Anselmo Measure O: Affirm tenant protection in San Anselmo
    • This ballot measure confirms tenant protections already in place, such as compensation for evictions without just cause and rent control. Vote yes on Measure N to protect sensible tenant protections. Supported by Urban Habitat and Public Advocates.

Please share this guide with your network, and don’t forget to vote by Tuesday, November 5th!

The Latest from Transform

Stay informed on our work to create more equitable, just, and affordable housing and transportation in California.

Address:
1721 Broadway, Suite 201
Oakland, CA 94612

Get in Touch:
510.740.3150
[email protected]

© 2025 Transform. All rights reserved.