Tag Archive for: Affordable Housing

The Ongoing Fight for California’s Climate

Last year, Transform was part of a coalition of environmental justice, climate, transportation, and affordable housing groups that worked with the governor and legislature to ensure California renewed its Cap-and-Invest Program that funds vital housing, transportation, and environmental justice programs. We won. 

But our victory didn’t last. Surprise proposed rule changes from the California Air Resources Board in April would drastically cut Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) revenue, taking all funding from the Affordable Housing Sustainable Communities Program (AHSC), the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP), and the Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP).

How we got here

In the 2025 legislative session, lawmakers were scheduled to set the terms for reauthorizing California’s Cap-and-Trade Program, which would have expired in 2030. The program charges polluters and continuously reduces the cap on greenhouse gas emissions with the goal of reducing and ultimately reversing climate change.

Instead, under Governor Gavin Newsom’s direction, the program reauthorization was immediate, taking effect in 2026. The new Cap-and-Invest Program assumed roughly $4 billion in annual revenue to the GGRF, allocated in descending priority:

  • The first $1 billion goes to High-Speed Rail.
  • The legislature allocates the next $1 billion at its discretion to a variety of emissions-reducing projects through the budget process each year. 
  • The final $2 billion is allocated to so-called “continuous appropriations” programs like AHSC, TIRCP, LCTOP, plus $250 million to CARB for programs to curb air pollution, $130 million for safe drinking water, and $200 million to the Department of Forestry for firefighting.

If Cap-and-Invest revenue falls short, funding disappears from the bottom up. Under CARB’s proposed rule changes, revenue for GGRF is expected to be $2 billion — no money for affordable housing, low-carbon transit, or intercity rail.

Rulemaking bait and switch

CARB oversees Cap-and-Invest and periodically makes rules governing the program. The agency initially proposed amendments to the Cap-and-Invest regulations in January 2026. These changes would have updated allowance budgets through 2045, providing a narrow incentive program to keep manufacturing in the state while keeping California on track to meet its 2030 climate goals.

Then, in April, without warning, CARB issued revised amendments, including a major rule change that would drastically increase the number of free allowances given to polluters, reducing revenue and increasing climate-killing emissions.

California’s green mirage

As of this writing, the price of crude oil sits at around $100/barrel, almost twice its price last fall when lawmakers finalized the Cap-and-Invest legislation. Oil companies are reaping windfall profits, yet CARB is giving them extra carbon credits at the price of defunding programs that effectively decarbonize our environment and improve quality of life for average Californians.

California has a reputation for being a leader on the environment and climate change, and in many respects, that reputation is deserved. However, the same regressive forces push against change in our energy and transportation sectors here as everywhere. Our governmental bodies can fall prey to that pressure, changing rules to shovel more money into the pockets of the privileged while disinvesting in the lives of the majority.

How we fight back

When we first conceived of this post, we expected to talk about the ongoing benefits from last year’s legislative victory. CARB’s actions show how our advances can get reversed; this is why Transform remains connected to coalitions actively working to ensure climate justice in California.

Our state won’t change without pressure from groups like Transform and people like you. Please take action with the letter campaign below. Please note: the letter is somewhat technical to address the CARB rulemaking process; it addresses the Cap-and-Invest funding rules and demands CARB not increase allowances to Big Oil.

Parking Wasn’t on the Radar at Housing California’s Annual Conference

But It Should Be.

At this year’s Housing California Conference, conversations focused on displacement, housing production, and cross-sector collaboration. Parking barely came up. That absence precludes a key opportunity to build more affordable housing. 

Across panels on updating regional planning standards (SB 375), fair housing, and local housing tools, speakers returned to a familiar challenge: California is still struggling to deliver enough homes in places where people can live without having to drive everywhere. We are not short on ideas. We are short on implementation.

Yet one of the most immediate, proven tools for unlocking housing was mostly missing from the conversation: parking policy. When it did come up, it was an exciting and promising story. 

Less parking, more housing

Parking requirements quietly shape what gets built, where, and at what cost. When cities require a set number of parking spaces, they are also requiring more land, more construction, and higher rents. These costs can be the difference between a project moving forward or not.

In one session, staff from the City of Sacramento shared how eliminating parking minimums in 2024 has helped remove barriers to building housing. By no longer requiring a fixed number of parking spaces, the city has reduced development costs, simplified project design, and made it easier for both affordable and market-rate housing projects to move forward. They described how removing these mandates gives developers more flexibility, reduces upfront costs, and helps projects that might not have penciled out or come together budget-wise actually get built.

Sacramento’s move reflects what we are seeing across California. When you remove unnecessary parking mandates, you give housing a chance to pencil out. You also open the door to more flexible, community-serving uses of space.

This is exactly what we are working toward through SPOT SJ.

Reimagining travel in downtown San Jose

In San Jose, Transform’s SPOT SJ project is showing that parking is not just a constraint — it’s an opportunity. Better parking management can support small businesses, reduce housing costs, and make it easier to repurpose space for people. The question is not whether parking exists. It is how we use it.

What stood out at Housing California was how aligned the broader housing conversation already is with this shift. Panels emphasized transit-oriented development, climate goals, and reinvestment without displacement. All of those goals depend on using land more efficiently.

You cannot fully get there while overbuilding parking that will mostly sit empty.

Centering parking in the housing affordability conversation

If we want to move from policy goals to real outcomes, car parking and transportation need to move from the sidelines to the center of the conversation. Not as technical details, but as core housing strategies.

Because sometimes the most powerful housing solution is not building more. It is removing what gets in the way.

Transform Urges MTC to Link Funding to Housing and Transit

On February 25, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) will take its final vote on its Transit-Oriented Communities (TOC) Policy. This vote will determine whether the region follows through on linking billions in transportation funding to real progress on affordable housing, tenant protections, and transit-oriented development.

Last month, at its January 28 meeting, MTC advanced major decisions on the One Bay Area Grant (OBAG) program, which distributes billions in regional transportation funding. Commissioners affirmed that OBAG can be used to incentivize jurisdictions to align with regional housing and climate goals. But they also left the door open to weakening the link between funding and TOC compliance.

The February 25 vote will determine whether OBAG remains a meaningful incentive for implementation or becomes disconnected from the housing and land use policies needed to make transit investments succeed. Transform and our allies are organizing to urge MTC not to weaken its TOC policy. You can help by emailing your MTC commissioners.



The TOC policy is how Plan Bay Area gets implemented

The TOC policy is the implementation tool for Plan Bay Area 2050. It aligns transportation funding with local policies that support affordable housing, prevent displacement, and reduce car dependence.

Because MTC cannot require cities to adopt land use policies directly, tying OBAG funding to TOC compliance is an essential lever to encourage compliance. This incentive structure ensures regional funding supports jurisdictions that are taking concrete steps to implement the region’s adopted goals.

Cities across the Bay Area have already begun adopting tenant protections, affordable housing policies, and parking reforms in response to the TOC polixy. Weakening the policy now would undermine that progress.

Weakening TOC would undermine the region’s housing and climate goals

Some commissioners and jurisdictions are pushing to allow cities to qualify for funding without implementing meaningful housing policies. This would defeat the purpose of the TOC policy, which was designed to reward implementation, not simply planning or minimum compliance.

Allowing jurisdictions to qualify without taking action would weaken one of the region’s most important tools for reducing displacement, increasing housing affordability, and supporting transit ridership.

Regional transportation funding should support communities that are taking action to advance regional goals.

On February 25, MTC must uphold a strong TOC policy and follow through on its commitment to link transportation funding with housing and climate outcomes.

Want to take your advocacy to the next level?

Show up to make a comment on Wednesday, February 25 (9:35 AM – 1 PM)

You can show up in person at 375 Beale Street, San Francisco, CA 94105 at 9:35 or on Zoom (link to be released on Friday, February 20).

If you plan to be on Zoom, you can sign up for our Timely Text Alerts to know when the item is up.

We will share sample talking points when the agenda is released.

Tell MTC to Link Funding to Real Housing Outcomes

On Wednesday, January 28, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission will take up critical decisions about how regional transportation funding is allocated through the One Bay Area Grant (OBAG) Program.

The January 28 MTC meeting will focus on tying OBAG funding to Transit-Oriented Communities (TOC) implementation. A follow-up meeting on February 25 is expected to focus on the TOC Policy itself.

These votes are deeply connected and critically important to the future of sustainable development in the Bay Area.

OBAG is one of the region’s strongest tools for shaping land use, housing, and transportation outcomes. How MTC structures OBAG funding now will either reinforce or undermine the TOC Policy before commissioners even vote on the final details next month.

We urge the Commission to use the January 28 meeting to send a clear signal that:

  • Regional funding must advance regional goals.
  • TOC compliance is essential to meeting climate, housing, and equity commitments.
  • Scarce public dollars should prioritize jurisdictions taking meaningful action toward meeting regional goals.

OBAG funding is one of the few levers MTC has to ensure that local decisions align with regional goals. Decisions the commission makes now will determine whether the TOC policy functions as a meaningful incentive or simply becomes another well-intentioned plan without teeth. 

Transform is advocating for a strong policy that uses OBAG funding as an incentive for communities to develop infill housing near transit, reducing car dependency and increasing livability and affordability.

Take action now to send a message to commissioners before their January 28 meeting

The TOC Policy was originally designed to move the Bay Area beyond baseline requirements by encouraging stronger tenant protections, more affordable housing near transit, better station access, and smarter parking policies. While early conversations with MTC suggested strong alignment around linking funding to TOC metrics, there is now a risk that the bar for cities to comply with TOC will be considerably lowered. 

Allocating OBAG funding to cities for meeting watered-down minimum requirements will undermine the work of other Bay Area cities that take transit-oriented development much more seriously. Furthermore, the precedent would erode further efforts to hold cities accountable to our climate, transportation, and housing goals.  

Email your MTC commissioner today and tell them to fund housing near transit, not more sprawl.



Transform will continue to push for a stronger TOC policy

If MTC is serious about meeting its housing, climate, and transportation goals, it must take a leadership role to ensure that regional funding supports the communities that are stepping up to advance infill housing near transit, reducing car dependency and increasing livability and affordability, not cities that continue to drag their feet and maintain the status quo. 

Between now and then, the message is clear: regional dollars should be conditioned on cities implementing policies and programs that support housing and business development that is near transportation, putting public transit in reach for more people and improving the quality of life in the Bay Area.

Transform will be turning out with other advocates and community members in January and February to push for a policy that delivers meaningful outcomes.

ClimatePlan Coalition Statement on Governor’s Proposed Budget

The ClimatePlan partnership works to improve land-use and transportation planning to protect Californians’ health, communities, environment, and climate. Transform helped found ClimatePlan in 2007 and continues to serve on its advisory board.

ClimatePlan is concerned that Governor Newsom’s proposed 2026–27 budget would represent a step backward, making it more difficult and expensive for Californians to live and get where they need to go. 

ClimatePlan identified several areas of concern in the budget, including:  

  • Insufficient funding for transit operations, leaving agencies without enough resources to provide frequent and reliable service
  • No increase for the popular Active Transportation Program, limiting communities’ ability to deliver safer streets for walking and biking
  • No restoration of funding for e-bike incentives, a popular and effective program abruptly eliminated at the end of 2025

One welcome development is the inclusion of the Free Transit Pass program, which helps make transit more affordable for students, older adults, and low-income Californians.

More broadly, ClimatePlan had hoped to see greater alignment in the budget with the recent recommendations of the Transit Transformation Task Force, including progress toward stable operating funding for transit, expanded transit priority lanes, stronger last-mile walking and biking solutions, and improved service coordination across transit systems. 

Proposed breakup of Affordable Housing program 

The governor’s budget proposes to break up funding for the Affordable Housing Sustainable Communities (AHSC) program, which integrates housing, transportation, and green space planning and has delivered affordable, well-located homes in disadvantaged communities. Under this proposal, transportation and housing investments would be separated across two different agencies. ClimatePlan is working to better understand the implications of this proposal, as it will directly impact projects that deliver meaningful improvements for Californians.

Aligning housing and transportation investments helps Californians live and get where they need to go affordably. They support strong, resilient communities and reduce the air pollution that sickens and kills thousands of Californians every year. 

“How California funds and approves transportation and housing projects shapes daily life for millions of people. Funding public transit and safe streets for walking and biking in the budget is essential to connect Californians to jobs, school, healthcare, and their communities by making it possible to get around without relying on a car,” said ClimatePlan Director Lesley Beatty. “ClimatePlan looks forward to working with state leaders and partners in the months ahead to improve the budget and advance solutions that meet Californians’ transportation needs.”

Contact: 

Lesley Beatty, Director 

[email protected] 

510-390-0440

Transform Opposes Anti-Housing Measure in Menlo Park

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Dec 4, 2025

Media Contact:  Zack Deutsch-Gross, Executive Director, Transform, [email protected], 415.637.0101

The 2026 citizens’ ballot initiative is a nakedly NIMBY attempt to prioritize parking over people  

A citizens’ initiative to block affordable housing on three city-owned parking lots in Menlo Park has now qualified for the November 2026 ballot. The City of Menlo Park had planned for at least 345 affordable homes on the site, but, if the initiative passes, it would be forced to run a citywide ballot measure before it could sell the land or “permanently diminish the availability, access, or convenience of parking”—a prerequisite to building affordable housing on the site. 

“Replacing empty parking lots with affordable housing is a no-brainer, especially in Menlo Park, where there are already great Caltrain, Samtrans, and free shuttle options,” says Transform’s Executive Director Zack Deutsch-Gross. “Transform strongly opposes this retrograde measure that places more value on car storage that sits empty much of the time than badly-needed homes for families.”

The measure would prohibit Menlo Park from selling, leasing, donating, disposing of, or conveying city-owned downtown parking lots without approval by a majority of voters. This would delay and possibly derail the city’s plan to build affordable housing on the sites. 

“San Mateo’s problems of displacement, homelessness, and long commutes will get worse if voters approve this measure,” said Transform’s Housing and Parking Policy Manager Julia Gerasimenko. “Not only will it take us further from our housing goals, but it will undercut transit investments and hurt local businesses in the long run.” 

The measure would also require that if the city intends to make any physical alterations to the downtown parking lots that would permanently diminish the availability, access, or convenience of parking, then the city must submit to the voters a subsequent ballot measure seeking authority to make such alterations prior to implementation. The measure further disallows any actions “which would diminish the availability, access or convenience of public parking for Downtown customers, workers and visitors.”

Parking is never free. It takes up precious civic space that could be devoted to other uses, such as more affordable housing to alleviate the critical shortage of affordable units throughout California and particularly on the Peninsula. Almost one-third of downtown Menlo Park is already dedicated to off-street parking. Residents and business owners pay for this overabundance of parking spots through higher rents, higher retail prices, and missed opportunities to build affordable housing or green space.  

Transform’s report, Parking Revolution/Housing Solution, showed how excess parking capacity generates higher vehicle ownership, traffic, and pollution, and reduces incentives for more affordable transportation modes. The Menlo Park initiative is a regressive and short-sighted attempt to lock the city into outmoded and disproven land use priorities, keeping the downtown core from becoming the vibrant, people-centered space it has the potential to be.

In addition to the parking and transit costs, the measure could make Menlo Park miss its housing development target, which is required by state law. If successful, it could create a new playbook for blocking affordable homes across California. Transform is committed to opposing this measure, which endangers Menlo Park and the entire Bay Area’s housing and transportation needs.

###

Transform works to ensure that people of all incomes thrive in a world safe from climate chaos. We envision vibrant neighborhoods, transformed by excellent, sustainable mobility options and affordable housing, where those historically impacted by racist disinvestment now have power and voice.

Traffic Congestion Is a Housing and Transit Problem, Not a Highway Problem

One of the hardest aspects of transportation advocacy is that the solutions to transportation problems are often counterintuitive. Induced demand or induced travel is the best-known example of this: when you widen a highway, that encourages more people to drive on it, returning congestion to the original levels within a few years. But what we’re missing is that traffic congestion isn’t a problem that can ever be solved by building more or wider roads, because it’s not a problem with the highway.

Yet Caltrans keeps planning highway expansions, and California legislators and the governor continue to prop up these unsustainable projects.

Picking up the right tools to solve congestion

The United States has spent decades and trillions of dollars prioritizing driving and car-centric infrastructure. As a result, there will always be more demand for driving at peak hours than there will be space on the roadway. Thankfully, there are better ways to reduce congestion, like building infill, affordable housing near jobs, schools, and transit hubs, plus adding bus, walking, and rolling options.

Unfortunately, when all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. In California, Caltrans is tasked with maintaining the highways and many state routes that wind through towns and cities, often serving as local roads and streets. This includes responding to problems on the roads, including backed-up traffic and slow travel times. For decades, Caltrans’ only tool to solve congestion has been roadbuilding, so that’s what it does — to the tune of $20 billion a year.

To truly solve California’s tangled traffic, we need to take the problem out of the hands of the road builders and address the root causes of congestion: building more affordable housing near jobs and improving public transportation options.

Wrong solutions create more problems

State Route 37, which connects Vallejo and other Solano County communities to Marin County and beyond, is the Bay Area poster child for wrong-headed highway widening. Caltrans proposes to spend $500 million to add lanes to a section of the roadway that will be underwater within the next couple of decades due to sea level rise. It’s a high price to pay for a very transitory solution.

And money isn’t the only cost of this destructive highway project. Governor Gavin Newsom just signed AB 697. The bill lifts limits on killing endangered species in the delicate marshland adjacent to the roadway during construction, clearing the way for Caltrans to bulldoze its plan through.

But even without the looming spectre of climate change, the SR 37 project won’t fix congestion because it doesn’t address its causes.  Marin County has more jobs than households, thanks to thriving businesses and tourist attractions, plus a strong science and technology industry, and workers gravitate to job centers in these locations. Meanwhile, Vallejo and neighboring communities on the other side of the Baylands have something the North Bay counties don’t: cheaper housing. The average rent for a three-bedroom unit in Vallejo is $2,476, while rent for the same unit in Marin is double that, at $4,995 a month. So workers in lower-income sectors —like the people who keep restaurants, hotels, tasting rooms, and spas running — are often forced to look far from their work to find housing they can afford.

The lack of affordable housing near jobs in North Bay communities is compounded by a lack of frequent and reliable public transit. This leaves workers with no choice but to drive between work and home, clogging SR 37. 

Widening a section of this highway to ease the congestion is like taking pain medication for a broken arm, but not setting the bone. You might feel better for a while, but you haven’t solved the problem.

Housing and transit are better investments

According to California’s Department of Housing and Community Development, Marin County needs to build over 14,000 units of new housing by 2031 to keep up with its housing needs. Building these homes is one of the best ways to reduce congestion — much better than adding new lanes to a highway that will simply be new surfaces for congestion in a few years. A report on the impact of California’s successful Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (AHSC) program showed that building 20,000 homes took more than 40,000 cars off the road each year. With a $500 million public investment, affordable housing developers could help finance thousands of housing units in the North Bay. 

Single-occupancy vehicles are a wildly inefficient way to move humans from one place to another. A recent study by the Climate and Community Institute modeled the impact of shifting $1 billion in highway spending to public transit. The study found that this shift saved almost $200,000 in congestion-related costs, as well as reducing vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by more than 1.8 million annually. Putting $500 million toward improved transit options would do much more to ease congestion on overcrowded roads like SR 37.

Highways aren’t drainpipes

Even the smartest engineer will come up with the wrong answer when they start with the wrong assumptions. For decades, our road planners have assumed that roads function like drainpipes: iIf the pipe is overflowing, get a wider pipe to handle the flow. 

A better metaphor for the network of streets and highways that connect our communities is as an expression of our desires, frustrations, and aspirations. Our roads show where we’ve failed by backing up traffic when transit and housing options are suboptimal. They show what we wish for with people creating ad hoc walkways to cut through too-long blocks and bike riders on sidewalks where streets are too dangerous. But our transportation systems can also highlight the best of us, lifting up our shared humanity and strengthening our social fabric, from the ubiquitous smile and head-nod of strangers riding the bus to the wave of a toddler zooming past on the back of an e-bike. 

Highway widening as the go-to solution for traffic congestion is a failure of attention and imagination. We need to direct the attention of the decision makers who allocate funding for transportation, housing, and transit to the true causes of congestion. And we need to expand our imagination of what’s possible to solve congestion from what has always been to what actually works. 

Transform is leading the fight to move beyond highways as the answer to every transportation challenge. We’re working to find real solutions that improve people’s lives and stop climate change. We hope you’ll join us.

Affordable Housing and Transit Are Smart Climate Investments

This post was written jointly by Transform and California Housing Partnership.

California has a reputation for being at the vanguard of environmentalism and climate change. The state’s creation of the Cap-and-Invest Program (formerly Cap-and-Trade) is a prime example. It sets limits on the emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and uses market forces to achieve those limits in the most cost-effective way. The proceeds from the sale of emission licenses are then invested in proven GHG reduction strategies that benefit all Californians. 

The evidence shows that California’s Cap-and-Invest Program has been a huge success to date and has become a model elsewhere in the United States as well as internationally. The only catch is that the program is currently authorized only until 2030, and uncertainty over its continuation is decreasing program funding and effectiveness. To address this, state leaders have proposed to extend the program through 2045 and signaled that they may want to make some changes in the process.   

As Governor Newsom and the California Legislature move to extend the Cap and Invest Program and reprioritize the investments, three programs in particular deserve continued priority support. The Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (AHSC) program, the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP), and the Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) have collectively reduced GHG emissions by over 36 million tons in the last ten years, equivalent to the annual emissions of the entire country of Sweden. 

AHSC makes housing affordable: By building affordable housing near transit, AHSC saves low-income households over $10,000 in rent per year, plus more in transportation costs, which is enough to pay for food for a year to help a low-income family stay out of poverty. 

AHSC is a good investment: Every dollar invested in AHSC from cap-and-invest revenue is matched by four dollars from other public and private sources, and 70% of the affordable housing approved under this program has already been built or is under construction. Fifty-six percent of the funds have been invested in communities most in need of environmental protection and economic opportunity. 

AHSC reduces traffic for everyone. A new report from California Housing Partnership and Enterprise Community Partners found that AHSC alone has led to 512 million fewer miles driven since its inception by enabling residents to live close to public transit and avoid driving for most of their trips. 



Public transit investment is vital to our regions. Cap-and-Invest’s transit programs, TIRCP and LCTOP, provide crucial funding to improve service and expand public transit systems that are still recovering from the decline in ridership they experienced during the pandemic. Many Californians don’t regularly ride public transit, but everyone benefits from reduced pollution and congestion on our roadways. The BART system in the Bay Area saves 1.2 million miles of driving every day. Without public transit, our roads would be endlessly clogged, and people who can’t afford to drive would be left without a way to get around.

Public transit creates jobs and affordable travel options. Major investments in public transit also provide high-quality jobs throughout the state and provide essential benefits to disadvantaged communities. Each dollar invested through TIRCP provides five times the value thanks to federal matching funds, while 94% of LCTOP dollars are invested directly in low-income and disadvantaged communities.

We call on Governor Newsom and the California Legislature to continue long-term commitments to these critical and successful programs. We further encourage the Governor and Legislature to improve the Cap-and-Invest Program by eliminating free emission allowances for the fossil fuel industry that are counterproductive to the program’s goals and harm sensitive communities. 

Climate, housing, and transit are three of the most critical challenges facing California. By preserving continuous funding for AHSC, TIRCP, and LCTOP, the governor and legislature have the opportunity to address all three simultaneously and comprehensively. That sounds like a perfect trifecta to us.

Email your legislators now and tell them you want Cap-and-Invest to fund housing and public transit.


Profiles in Pride

Bay Area LGBTQIA+ Transportation and Housing Advocates

Pride Month is extra poignant this year as queer and trans communities are under attack from the new regime in Washington. So it’s a good time to lift up some of the LGBTQIA+ community members who have worked toward housing and transportation equity in the Bay Area. 

Harvey Milk (1930–1978)

Harvey Milk, also known as the Mayor of Castro Street, was the first out gay candidate elected to office in California. After three unsuccessful campaigns for San Francisco City Supervisor, in 1976, Mayor George Moscone appointed Milk to the Board of Permit Appeals, making him the first out LGBTQIA+ commissioner in the United States. The following year, in November 1977, Milk won his election to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, using his position to fight against anti-LGBTQIA+ efforts in California. On November 27, 1978, Milk and Mayor Moscone were assassinated by Dan White, a former member of the Board of Supervisors, in City Hall.

Roma Guy

Roma Guy was a founder of several community-based women’s and girl’s organizations such as SF Women’s Building, SF Women Against Rape, The Women’s Foundation, and La Casa de las Madres, a safe haven for women escaping abusive relationships. She served on the Mayor’s Local Homeless Board and the James Hormel LGBTQ Advisory Council for the SF Public Library.  She was appointed Co-Chair, along with the Director of Public Health and Sheriff, to the City/County and Community Jail Replacement Project 2016–2017, to develop alternatives to incarceration.

Whit Joaquin Guerrero

Joaquin Guerrero was the first Director of Our Trans Home SF, a BIPOC-led trans housing program. He led the opening of the first Transgender Navigation Center in the U.S. and helped envision the End Trans Homelessness initiative, the first initiative of its kind for trans and gender nonconforming people. Guerrero also served on the Trans Advisory Committee of the Office of Trans Initiatives and the City and County’s Shelter Monitoring Committee. He is currently a Program Officer for the Arlene and Michael Rosen Foundation, a mediator in supportive housing for the San Francisco Bar Association’s Conflict Intervention Services, and a Capacity Coach for the Transgender Strategy Center.

Megan Rohrer

Megan Rohrer has worked to support unhoused people, including LGBTQIA+ populations, for over two decades. They have worked on homelessness in their native Sioux Falls, SD, San Francisco, and Kona, HI. Since 2022, Rohrer has served on the Local Homeless Coordinating Board, which advises the San Francisco Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing. They also serve as the co-chair of the San Francisco Local Homelessness Coordinating Board.

Courtney Brousseau (1997–2020)

Courtney Brousseau founded Gay for Transit, an LGBTQIA+ group that advocated for better transit in San Francisco. He was also a committed bike rider and bike advocate before he was tragically killed in a drive-by shooting at age 22.

Legislature’s response to the California budget provides a lifeline for transit, invests in housing, and ignores biking and walking

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Zack Deutsch-Gross, [email protected], (415) 637-0101

California legislators have agreed on a budget that prioritizes needed investments in affordable housing and provides a lifeline to Bay Area transit agencies facing fiscal cliffs. However, by prioritizing highways over active transportation, the budget misses a major opportunity to meet the scale of the climate crisis.

The two-party agreement in the legislature invests $500 million in Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC) and $120 million to the Multifamily Housing Program, rejects the Governor’s proposal to cut $1.1 billion from transit programs, and provides Bay Area transit agencies with a $750 million loan to keep buses and trains running as they seek long-term operating funds.

“We applaud the legislature’s commitment to affordable housing and keeping our transit agencies afloat,” said Transform Policy Director Zack Deutsch-Gross. “These vital investments keep the Bay Area on track toward a 2026 regional transportation measure, which depends on the legislature passing SB 63 authorizing legislation later this year.”

However, the proposal fails to address the $400 million cut from California’s Active Transportation Program in last year’s budget. As a result, only 13 of the over 300 project applications to promote safe biking and walking will move forward.

“Instead of shifting dollars toward sustainable transportation alternatives, this proposal continues to fund Caltrans’ highway expansion agenda,” said Deutsch-Gross. “Even in tight budget years, the climate crisis demands more than preserving the status quo.”

While the legislature’s proposal does not mention reauthorizing Cap-and-Trade, now Cap-and-Invest, it does allocate $500 million to CalFIRE from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, limiting GGRF’s ability to support affordable housing, transit, and environmental justice priorities.

###

Transform works to ensure that people of all incomes thrive in a world safe from climate chaos. We envision vibrant neighborhoods, transformed by excellent, sustainable mobility options and affordable housing, where those historically impacted by racist disinvestment now have power and voice.

The Latest from Transform

Stay informed on our work to create more equitable, just, and affordable housing and transportation in California.

Address:
1721 Broadway, Suite 201
Oakland, CA 94612

Get in Touch:
510.740.3150
[email protected]

© 2025 Transform. All rights reserved.