Tag Archive for: Beyond Highways

Transform Speaks Out in Sacramento

As the California legislature was moving bills through committees in the last couple of weeks, Transform traveled to Sacramento to advocate for and against critical bills. Jeanie Ward-Waller of Fearless Advocacy recently testified on our behalf at hearings on a bill to use environmental mitigation fees to fund affordable housing near transit and one that would lift environmental regulations ahead of a planned highway widening.

Testifying in committee is a powerful way to bring our message and expertise to decision makers as bills advance through the legislative process.

Leveraging CEQA to fund affordable homes near transit

Transportation makes up the largest share of GHG emissions in California and is increasing in large part due to entrenched land use and housing practices. If we are to meet the climate and air quality goals, we need to not only effectively address the additional driving caused by new highways and development projects, but also do so in a way that improves housing and land use patterns.

The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires projects to mitigate their environmental impacts, including the harms caused by driving, measured by vehicle miles traveled (VMT). When done well, VMT mitigation measures, which range from transit service and passes to bike/ped improvements and roadway pricing, can be an effective means of alleviating environmental harm. Affordable housing near transit is one of the best ways to mitigate VMT, but coordination between project sponsors and local housing developers is often tricky and fails to move forward.  

Under AB 1244 (Wicks), a developer can mitigate VMT impact by contributing an amount of money per extra mile of induced travel to a statewide Transit-Oriented Development Implementation Fund, where funds are then reinvested in affordable housing projects in the same region as the project, and ideally, the same city or county. 

The bill includes strong accountability and effectiveness provisions, tasking the Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation to set an accurate price for VMT reduction and reassess every three years, and requiring the Office of Housing and Community Development to validate reductions using established models. 

Watch our testimony in support of AB 1244 in the Natural Resources Committee. 

Making it easier to expand climate-killing highways 

AB 697 (Wilson) clears the way for highway widening on State Route 37 between Solano, Napa, and Sonoma Counties by authorizing the taking (i.e., killing) of species protected under the California Endangered Species Act.

Transform opposes highway widening on principle because we believe California’s resources would be better spent on sustainable transportation options. It makes no sense to keep adding to a transportation system that brought us to the brink of climate collapse; we need to invest in the shift to proven, sustainable transportation. But widening SR 37 is a particularly bad project. It’s a band-aid rather than a fix for the real issue of too little affordable housing in Sonoma and Napa Counties, so workers need to commute from Solano County and beyond. And, this stretch of highway close to the San Francisco Bay is projected to be underwater within two decades, flooding the current construction and requiring a second, costlier project to raise the roadbed above the waterline. 

So we showed up to oppose this bill at the Water, Parks, and Wildlife Committee.

Both bills made it out of their committees. AB 697 passed Appropriations and next faces a vote of the full Assembly. AB 1244 is awaiting a vote in Appropriations. Transform will continue to follow these and the rest of the bills on our legislative agenda. Bringing Bay Area voices and concerns to Sacramento is a critical element of our theory of change.

Project Location 101-92 Interchange

Opposition Grows to San Mateo Highway Widening

Almost a year ago, Transform signed on to a letter opposing a project to build new highway lanes connecting State Route 92 from the San Mateo Bridge to Highway 101. The project — first proposed in 2016 by the San Mateo County Transportation Authority (SMCTA), City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG), and Caltrans — recently gained powerful new opponents: the San Mateo City Council.

Building a movement against new lanes, one project at a time

The 101/92 connector project is particularly fraught because it would require taking more than 30 properties by eminent domain, including public parks. Bus service across the San Mateo Bridge was discontinued during the pandemic and hasn’t been restored; making more space for cars instead of resuming suspended transit service is the wrong approach.

Advocates have been building a movement against this project, and it paid off at a recent City Council meeting, where Streetsblog SF reported that there was overwhelming public comment in opposition to the new connector, with no one speaking in favor.

Members of the San Mateo City Council criticized the project for prioritizing car travel over other forms of transportation and contributing to the pollution burden in the affected communities. The highway expansion would come at the expense of homes, including senior housing, and public parks that provide recreational space for children. 

Transform is working with our allies to encourage planners, engineers, agency staff, and elected leaders to look beyond highways for solutions to local and regional transportation issues. Building new highway miles in a time of accelerating climate crisis is effectively pouring gasoline on a burning building. Change is hard, but we believe there are transportation and housing options that will work better for everyone while mitigating climate change.

Our budget should reflect our values

The enormous expenditure required for even a few miles of new highway could be more productively spent. For example, civic leaders could use the expected $300 million price tag for this highway expansion to restart the transbay public transit service or build workforce housing on the Peninsula, so workers aren’t forced into long commutes by high housing prices.

The San Mateo City Council will write a letter requesting that the involved agencies redirect the funds to projects that will truly benefit the community. In the face of such strong opposition from both residents, advocates, and elected officials, we hope SMCTA, C/CAG, and Caltrans will scrap this project. 

Read the letter:

MTC released its latest transportation plan. Here’s why we’re worried.

The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) recently released its final blueprint of Plan Bay Area 2050+, the region’s latest long-range plan to address transportation, housing, the economy, and the environment over the next 30 years. According to MTC, Plan Bay Area 2050+ is “an opportunity to refine select plan strategies to integrate the lessons of the last three years.” 

Unfortunately, much of the plan could have been written for the past 30 years, as it continues highway expansion policies that worsen congestion and contribute to a warming planet while continuing to under-invest in active and public transportation infrastructure, making the Bay Area less affordable for the average working family. 

A recently released project list details $45 billion in highway projects over the next 30 years. While that represents about 9% of MTC’s total projected transportation investment, a smaller percentage than other metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) and California’s state transportation budget put toward highway widening, much of the highway spending is front-loaded at the beginning of the plan, undercutting transit, walking, and biking investments while baking in congestion, pollution, and emissions for the next three decades.

Plan Bay Area 2050+ will likely fail to meet its emissions reduction target

As part of Senate Bill 375, MTC is required to reduce its greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions from passenger vehicles by 19% by 2035. As our state contends with horrific wildfires during a wildfire season that extends year-round while also battling floods and drought, hitting this goal is more important than ever. However, according to the California Air Resources Board’s emission-tracking dashboard, we are moving in the wrong direction, with regional GHGs and vehicle miles traveled exceeding pre-pandemic levels. 

Unfortunately, based on the transportation project list, we’re concerned that Plan Bay Area 2050+ is unlikely to achieve the required emissions reduction. Of the $45 billion dedicated to highways, over a third, about $16 billion, is earmarked for highway expansion, interchanges, and ramp widening, which all generate significant emissions and don’t even reduce congestion. 

While the highway investment represents a fraction of the overall plan, it has an outsized climate impact. According to research from Georgetown Climate Center, you would need 10 times the investment in intercity rail to offset the emissions generated by each lane mile of highway expansion. 

Making matters worse, Transform has already raised concerns about two of these highway expansion projects, SR 37 and I-680. We believe these projects will have much larger negative VMT and emissions impacts than MTC is projecting. 

Front-loading climate destruction

MTC has put much of the highway widening in the first 10 years of the plan, baking in climate-killing emissions for the duration of the plan and ensuring maximum damage from the additional vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Nearly 80% of the highway expansion and 41 out of 88 projects are slated for the early years of the plan.

At the same time, some of the most effective greenhouse gas reduction strategies — all-lane tolling and pricing parking — won’t begin until 2035 at the earliest. We are already late in deploying these tools; we cannot and should not wait another 10 years before we take significant steps to reduce driving.

MTC — and all of California’s state and regional agencies — must stop acting like climate change is anything but an emergency. While Plan Bay Area 2050+ is an improvement on previous plans, it is simply not aggressive enough to compensate for decades of nonstop highway expansion. We can act quickly when needed; the actions already taken to respond to and streamline rebuilding after the Los Angeles fires demonstrate that. We need the same sense of urgency in addressing the climate emergency that we have in rebuilding after the catastrophes it causes or makes worse.

We need a better direction for the Bay Area’s transportation future

The projects included in Plan Bay Area 2050+ will set the funding decisions and priorities for the Bay Area’s transportation, housing, environment, and economy for the next 30 years, so getting this right is critical. Setting the wrong priorities or front-loading funding to projects that aren’t aligned with the priorities could lead to missed funding opportunities and missed climate goals.

Transform’s advocacy will inform the final blueprint, which the MTC will approve this spring. MTC will then send it to the California Air Resources Board, which must approve it and certify that it will meet sustainable communities strategy goals. We will continue advocating as the agencies involved finalize the plan over the next year, working to eliminate highway widening and expand funding for programs that support climate mitigation and the affordable, accessible, sustainable transportation options the Bay Area needs.

The Latest from Transform

Stay informed on our work to create more equitable, just, and affordable housing and transportation in California.

Address:
560 14th Street, Suite 400
Oakland, CA 94612

Get in Touch:
510.740.3150
[email protected]

© 2025 Transform. All rights reserved.