Tag Archive for: Public Transit

ClimatePlan Coalition Statement on Governor’s Proposed Budget

ClimatePlan is concerned that Governor Newsom’s proposed 2026–27 budget would represent a step backward, making it more difficult and expensive for Californians to live and get where they need to go. 

ClimatePlan identified several areas of concern in the budget, including:  

  • Insufficient funding for transit operations, leaving agencies without enough resources to provide frequent and reliable service
  • No increase for the popular Active Transportation Program, limiting communities’ ability to deliver safer streets for walking and biking
  • No restoration of funding for e-bike incentives, a popular and effective program abruptly eliminated at the end of 2025

One welcome development is the inclusion of the Free Transit Pass program, which helps make transit more affordable for students, older adults, and low-income Californians.

More broadly, ClimatePlan had hoped to see greater alignment in the budget with the recent recommendations of the Transit Transformation Task Force, including progress toward stable operating funding for transit, expanded transit priority lanes, stronger last-mile walking and biking solutions, and improved service coordination across transit systems. 

Proposed breakup of Affordable Housing program 

The governor’s budget proposes to break up funding for the Affordable Housing Sustainable Communities (AHSC) program, which integrates housing, transportation, and green space planning and has delivered affordable, well-located homes in disadvantaged communities. Under this proposal, transportation and housing investments would be separated across two different agencies. ClimatePlan is working to better understand the implications of this proposal, as it will directly impact projects that deliver meaningful improvements for Californians.

Aligning housing and transportation investments helps Californians live and get where they need to go affordably. They support strong, resilient communities and reduce the air pollution that sickens and kills thousands of Californians every year. 

“How California funds and approves transportation and housing projects shapes daily life for millions of people. Funding public transit and safe streets for walking and biking in the budget is essential to connect Californians to jobs, school, healthcare, and their communities by making it possible to get around without relying on a car,” said ClimatePlan Director Lesley Beatty. “ClimatePlan looks forward to working with state leaders and partners in the months ahead to improve the budget and advance solutions that meet Californians’ transportation needs.”

Contact: 

Lesley Beatty, Director 

[email protected] 

510-390-0440


Transform is a member of ClimatePlan.

MTC Clears the Way for Transit Funding Initiative

The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) met yesterday to create a five-county transportation district encompassing San Francisco, Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, and Santa Clara Counties. These Bay Area counties opted to be part of a regional measure to provide stable funding for public transit under SB 63, passed by the legislature last year. MTC’s action is a necessary precursor to putting the measure before voters.

What will the regional funding measure do?

The measure establishes a half-cent sales tax in the five counties, with money going to fund transit operations and rider-first improvements. Transit operators have struggled to maintain bus and train schedules to serve the people who rely on them to get around, as the pandemic, changing commute patterns, and federal funding cuts have strained resources. The guaranteed revenue from this measure will support the frequent, reliable transit that’s the backbone of the Bay Area’s transportation infrastructure. 

Why do we need a new transportation district?

The funds collected will be allocated to transit operations within the five participating counties. The funding district creates a mechanism for collecting and distributing funds, particularly to multi-county operators such as BART.

What’s next for regional transit funding?

The newly established district could have opted to put the initiative on the ballot but voted not to do so in order to clear the way for a citizen’s initiative. To have the best chance of passing in November, Transform and our allies will collect signatures to put the measure on the ballot as a citizen initiative. Citizen initiatives only need 50% + 1 to succeed; funding measures placed on the ballot by elected bodies must get two-thirds of the vote to pass due to Prop 13. 

Look for an announcement in the coming weeks about signature collection and what you can do to help get this critical measure on the ballot. Let’s make 2026 the year we save public transit!

ac transit bus

Transform Applauds Bay Area Transit’s New Tap to Pay Option 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

December 8, 2025

Contact: Abibat Rahman-Davies, [email protected]

On December 10, 2025, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) will roll out an easier way to pay for transit in the  Bay Area, allowing riders to tap any contactless credit or debit card or digital wallet. Previously, tap-to-pay was only available on BART.

Transform applauds this advance in fare collection, which will:

  • Encourage more people to ride by removing a barrier to using public transit, allowing riders to hop on without loading money onto a Clipper card or having cash.
  • Make it easier to pay as you go for transit, reducing the financial burden of transit costs.
  • Adding an easy, efficient, and cost-effective method for transit providers to collect fares.
  • Provide free and reduced transfers between Bay Area transit providers, providing a more affordable, synchronized transit system. 

“Tap-to-pay is a huge step forward for Bay Area transit that will boost ridership and improve the user experience,” said Abibat Rahman-Davies, Transform’s Transportation Policy Manager.  “With the free and reduced transfers, riders won’t have to think twice about transferring between systems — they’ll just pick whatever trip gets them there the fastest.” 

Abibat Rahman-Davies and Transform Executive Director Zack Deutsch-Gross will be at the press conference for the launch of tap-to-pay on Wednesday, December 10, 2025, at 11 a.m. at Embarcadero Station in San Francisco.

More access needed

Unfortunately, riders can’t access discounted fares or monthly passes through the tap-to-pay system —  yet. Transform’s report, Fair and Accessible Fares: Economic Justice in Transit, outlines the additional steps MTC should take to help all riders take advantage of the new system.

Rahman-Davies, the report’s author, said, “I hope to see fare discount options for students, seniors, and low-income riders added as soon as possible. Without these additions and features to support people without banking access, tap to pay risks leaving our most vulnerable riders behind.” 

###

Transform works to ensure that people of all incomes thrive in a world safe from climate chaos. We envision vibrant neighborhoods, transformed by excellent, sustainable mobility options and affordable housing, where those historically impacted by racist disinvestment now have power and voice.

Webinar Delves Into Transit Payment Systems that Benefit All Riders

On November 13, 2025, Transform convened a panel to discuss our report, Fair and Accessible Fares: Economic Justice in Transit. Report author Abibat Rahman-Davies was joined by Carl Sedoryk, CEO and General Manager of Monterey-Salinas Transit, Aaron Hirsh, Principal at Cities for Financial Empowerment Fund, and Greg Fair, Director of the California Digital Identity Program.

Watch the webinar.

A better path forward for the Bay Area

Rahman-Davies outlined the main points of Transform’s report, which highlights best practices for transitioning to open payments for fare collection. Paying with a credit or debit card, rather than loading money onto a Clipper transit card, could be a big benefit for low-income riders because they wouldn’t have to pay in advance. However, since MTC’s open payments system can’t currently accommodate fare discounts, many of the most vulnerable users will be faced with a choice of paying full fare or sticking with the prepaid Clipper card.

In addition, those without bank accounts or digital payment options can’t use the new system. Read the full report at the end of this post.

A different model for open payments: Monterey-Salinas Transit

Sedoryk described the path Monterey-Salinas Transit (MST) took to adopting open payments, some of which is described as a case study in Transform’s report. The agency serves a four-county area that’s largely rural; it’s a small operator with 160 buses and 3.5 million annual passengers, many of whom are low-income.

Sedoryk described his epiphany of using tap-to-pay at a local taco truck and deciding, if the food truck can do that, it was time for MST to adopt the system. The agency’s system includes a fare-capping feature where costs top out when a rider reaches the number of rides for a weekly pass; 40% of riders reach the fare caps. 

MST used multiple vendors and found it easy to add and update fare policies with the new system. This allowed it to do a promotion that gave money back to riders or allowed them to donate to charity. The system has seen an uptick in ridership of 50% since COVID but a 200% increase in contactless payments. 

MST has seen additional benefits from open payments. The contactless system has far fewer failures where the system doesn’t properly read the card, reducing administrative costs. One-third of violent incidents with drivers start with a fare dispute; making it easier to pay can reduce this. 

Only 13% of MST’s rides are paid for with tap-to-pay; riders still pay mostly with cash. But the machines that accept cash are prone to breaking down and costly to maintain. The operator hopes to go cashless by 2027, a move that will save $100,000 annually — enough to pay for two additional buses and the mechanics to maintain them. Before it does that, though, it needs to provide a closed payment system for those without bank cards or digital payments. MST is in talks to create a card that will work on other connecting systems as well.

The cost of maintaining fare systems is one more argument for free public transit; the savings will offset the lost revenue, and the increased ridership and reduced traffic congestion benefit everyone.

The costs of being unbanked

Hirsh noted the toll that being unbanked takes, including having no safe place for one’s money, the need to use expensive services like check-cashing stores, and difficulty accessing things like transit. He’s been working with transit agencies, including Monterey-Salinas Transit, to connect riders with BankOn-certified bank accounts.

Hirsh has a host of ways that transit agencies can help riders connect with banking services. For example, bank access could be built in to services that connect people with fare discounts. Or transit agencies and banks could offer a rebate where the first $50 someone spends on transit goes back into their new bank account. 

Increasing banking is a way transit agencies can improve the financial well-being of their riders while also reducing the burden on their systems.

Technology connects riders with fare discounts

Fair leads the Digital Identity Program at CalITP, which has been making big advances in digital verification for benefit eligibility, while protecting users’ privacy. He said identification shouldn’t be “the star of the show,” but something that people can easily use to access a service. 

To make verification easy, the state relies on systems people are already using, so they don’t have to create a new login. It also tries to leverage existing behaviors, because it’s hard to change behavior. 

But there are complications. Fair’s department has had to dig deep to find the right data sources to prove eligibility for different programs such as VA discounts. In addition, policies vary around the state for things such as what age makes someone a senior. Transit is a great testing ground to discover and work on these and other issues.

Fair described a move afoot to come up with unified definitions for things like senior discounts at transit agencies across California. CalITP is working to support different programs like the one at Monterey-Salinas Transit as they roll out.

In the end, new open payments technologies will give transit providers systems that are cheaper to build and easier to support while giving users data privacy and control. Transit benefits could even be a gateway to prequalify riders for other benefits, which could be a game-changer for people who struggle with burdensome paperwork. 

If you want to encourage the Metropolitan Transportation Commission to add fare discounts and other equity features to its Clipper 2.0 open payments system, sign this petition and read Transform’s report.

Traffic Congestion Is a Housing and Transit Problem, Not a Highway Problem

One of the hardest aspects of transportation advocacy is that the solutions to transportation problems are often counterintuitive. Induced demand or induced travel is the best-known example of this: when you widen a highway, that encourages more people to drive on it, returning congestion to the original levels within a few years. But what we’re missing is that traffic congestion isn’t a problem that can ever be solved by building more or wider roads, because it’s not a problem with the highway.

Yet Caltrans keeps planning highway expansions, and California legislators and the governor continue to prop up these unsustainable projects.

Picking up the right tools to solve congestion

The United States has spent decades and trillions of dollars prioritizing driving and car-centric infrastructure. As a result, there will always be more demand for driving at peak hours than there will be space on the roadway. Thankfully, there are better ways to reduce congestion, like building infill, affordable housing near jobs, schools, and transit hubs, plus adding bus, walking, and rolling options.

Unfortunately, when all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. In California, Caltrans is tasked with maintaining the highways and many state routes that wind through towns and cities, often serving as local roads and streets. This includes responding to problems on the roads, including backed-up traffic and slow travel times. For decades, Caltrans’ only tool to solve congestion has been roadbuilding, so that’s what it does — to the tune of $20 billion a year.

To truly solve California’s tangled traffic, we need to take the problem out of the hands of the road builders and address the root causes of congestion: building more affordable housing near jobs and improving public transportation options.

Wrong solutions create more problems

State Route 37, which connects Vallejo and other Solano County communities to Marin County and beyond, is the Bay Area poster child for wrong-headed highway widening. Caltrans proposes to spend $500 million to add lanes to a section of the roadway that will be underwater within the next couple of decades due to sea level rise. It’s a high price to pay for a very transitory solution.

And money isn’t the only cost of this destructive highway project. Governor Gavin Newsom just signed AB 697. The bill lifts limits on killing endangered species in the delicate marshland adjacent to the roadway during construction, clearing the way for Caltrans to bulldoze its plan through.

But even without the looming spectre of climate change, the SR 37 project won’t fix congestion because it doesn’t address its causes.  Marin County has more jobs than households, thanks to thriving businesses and tourist attractions, plus a strong science and technology industry, and workers gravitate to job centers in these locations. Meanwhile, Vallejo and neighboring communities on the other side of the Baylands have something the North Bay counties don’t: cheaper housing. The average rent for a three-bedroom unit in Vallejo is $2,476, while rent for the same unit in Marin is double that, at $4,995 a month. So workers in lower-income sectors —like the people who keep restaurants, hotels, tasting rooms, and spas running — are often forced to look far from their work to find housing they can afford.

The lack of affordable housing near jobs in North Bay communities is compounded by a lack of frequent and reliable public transit. This leaves workers with no choice but to drive between work and home, clogging SR 37. 

Widening a section of this highway to ease the congestion is like taking pain medication for a broken arm, but not setting the bone. You might feel better for a while, but you haven’t solved the problem.

Housing and transit are better investments

According to California’s Department of Housing and Community Development, Marin County needs to build over 14,000 units of new housing by 2031 to keep up with its housing needs. Building these homes is one of the best ways to reduce congestion — much better than adding new lanes to a highway that will simply be new surfaces for congestion in a few years. A report on the impact of California’s successful Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (AHSC) program showed that building 20,000 homes took more than 40,000 cars off the road each year. With a $500 million public investment, affordable housing developers could help finance thousands of housing units in the North Bay. 

Single-occupancy vehicles are a wildly inefficient way to move humans from one place to another. A recent study by the Climate and Community Institute modeled the impact of shifting $1 billion in highway spending to public transit. The study found that this shift saved almost $200,000 in congestion-related costs, as well as reducing vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by more than 1.8 million annually. Putting $500 million toward improved transit options would do much more to ease congestion on overcrowded roads like SR 37.

Highways aren’t drainpipes

Even the smartest engineer will come up with the wrong answer when they start with the wrong assumptions. For decades, our road planners have assumed that roads function like drainpipes: iIf the pipe is overflowing, get a wider pipe to handle the flow. 

A better metaphor for the network of streets and highways that connect our communities is as an expression of our desires, frustrations, and aspirations. Our roads show where we’ve failed by backing up traffic when transit and housing options are suboptimal. They show what we wish for with people creating ad hoc walkways to cut through too-long blocks and bike riders on sidewalks where streets are too dangerous. But our transportation systems can also highlight the best of us, lifting up our shared humanity and strengthening our social fabric, from the ubiquitous smile and head-nod of strangers riding the bus to the wave of a toddler zooming past on the back of an e-bike. 

Highway widening as the go-to solution for traffic congestion is a failure of attention and imagination. We need to direct the attention of the decision makers who allocate funding for transportation, housing, and transit to the true causes of congestion. And we need to expand our imagination of what’s possible to solve congestion from what has always been to what actually works. 

Transform is leading the fight to move beyond highways as the answer to every transportation challenge. We’re working to find real solutions that improve people’s lives and stop climate change. We hope you’ll join us.

Transform Speaks on Equity in Open Payments

In a few weeks, Transform will release a report on how to ensure that open payment systems on transit serve all riders equally and where the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s (MTC) rollout of open payments on BART falls short. last week, Transform’s transportation policy manager, Abibat Rahman-Davies, spoke at a webinar on open payments hosted by Seamless Bay Area.

What are open payments?

An open payments system is one that allows riders to tap a credit or debit card on a fare reader and have the fare deducted from their account. Unlike the original Clipper Card, users don’t have to load money onto a transit card, which allows riders to be more flexible with their finances — crucial for low-income riders.

Open payments represent an advance in access, as long as transit providers build equity into the program from the launch. 

Watch the full webinar.

Affordable Housing and Transit Are Smart Climate Investments

This post was written jointly by Transform and California Housing Partnership.

California has a reputation for being at the vanguard of environmentalism and climate change. The state’s creation of the Cap-and-Invest Program (formerly Cap-and-Trade) is a prime example. It sets limits on the emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and uses market forces to achieve those limits in the most cost-effective way. The proceeds from the sale of emission licenses are then invested in proven GHG reduction strategies that benefit all Californians. 

The evidence shows that California’s Cap-and-Invest Program has been a huge success to date and has become a model elsewhere in the United States as well as internationally. The only catch is that the program is currently authorized only until 2030, and uncertainty over its continuation is decreasing program funding and effectiveness. To address this, state leaders have proposed to extend the program through 2045 and signaled that they may want to make some changes in the process.   

As Governor Newsom and the California Legislature move to extend the Cap and Invest Program and reprioritize the investments, three programs in particular deserve continued priority support. The Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (AHSC) program, the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP), and the Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) have collectively reduced GHG emissions by over 36 million tons in the last ten years, equivalent to the annual emissions of the entire country of Sweden. 

AHSC makes housing affordable: By building affordable housing near transit, AHSC saves low-income households over $10,000 in rent per year, plus more in transportation costs, which is enough to pay for food for a year to help a low-income family stay out of poverty. 

AHSC is a good investment: Every dollar invested in AHSC from cap-and-invest revenue is matched by four dollars from other public and private sources, and 70% of the affordable housing approved under this program has already been built or is under construction. Fifty-six percent of the funds have been invested in communities most in need of environmental protection and economic opportunity. 

AHSC reduces traffic for everyone. A new report from California Housing Partnership and Enterprise Community Partners found that AHSC alone has led to 512 million fewer miles driven since its inception by enabling residents to live close to public transit and avoid driving for most of their trips. 



Public transit investment is vital to our regions. Cap-and-Invest’s transit programs, TIRCP and LCTOP, provide crucial funding to improve service and expand public transit systems that are still recovering from the decline in ridership they experienced during the pandemic. Many Californians don’t regularly ride public transit, but everyone benefits from reduced pollution and congestion on our roadways. The BART system in the Bay Area saves 1.2 million miles of driving every day. Without public transit, our roads would be endlessly clogged, and people who can’t afford to drive would be left without a way to get around.

Public transit creates jobs and affordable travel options. Major investments in public transit also provide high-quality jobs throughout the state and provide essential benefits to disadvantaged communities. Each dollar invested through TIRCP provides five times the value thanks to federal matching funds, while 94% of LCTOP dollars are invested directly in low-income and disadvantaged communities.

We call on Governor Newsom and the California Legislature to continue long-term commitments to these critical and successful programs. We further encourage the Governor and Legislature to improve the Cap-and-Invest Program by eliminating free emission allowances for the fossil fuel industry that are counterproductive to the program’s goals and harm sensitive communities. 

Climate, housing, and transit are three of the most critical challenges facing California. By preserving continuous funding for AHSC, TIRCP, and LCTOP, the governor and legislature have the opportunity to address all three simultaneously and comprehensively. That sounds like a perfect trifecta to us.

Email your legislators now and tell them you want Cap-and-Invest to fund housing and public transit.


One Step Closer to Stable Funding for Bay Area Transit

This post was originally published on July 30, 2025, and updated on August 13, 2025 to include the addition of Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties to the regional measure.

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has found that the Bay Area needs to double transit ridership in order to meet our region’s climate goals. Yet we could move in the opposite direction if we don’t develop a stable, ongoing source of funding. Some operators could be forced to drastically curtail service, gridlocking our transportation systems. 

So, it’s good news that the Bay Area Transit Funding Bill, SB 63, has cleared all the policy committees in the legislature. The legislation gives Bay Area counties the authority to put a transit funding measure on the November 2026 ballot. Voters must approve the revenue mechanism and expenditure plan before it can take effect.

The Bay Area Transit Funding Bill has three more hurdles to clear: the Assembly Appropriations Committee, a vote of the full Assembly, and getting the governor’s signature. As the measure continues to make its way through the legislative process, Transform, and our allies are advocating for a better funding source and improvements that support riders throughout the region, and we see some positive signs. Based on the newly released expenditure plan, here’s where SB 63 and the Bay Area’s transit future stand with the legislature on recess.

Positive developments for region-wide transit

Moving legislation through can be a messy process, with changing provisions and shifting support. We’re seeing these positive developments in SB 63:

  • As formulated, it would generate around $1 billion annually for transit, enough to avert massive service cuts while not entirely filling the funding gap.
  • It includes about $46 million annually for transit transformation. This could provide discounted transfers and fares, making transit more affordable and encouraging more people to ride. And it would fund wayfinding and accessibility improvements that advocates have asked for, creating a more integrated transit system throughout the Bay Area.
  • Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties opted into the measure, despite not being initially included in the legislation. A five-county measure is a major win for regional connectivity and collaboration, particularly for rail operators BART and Caltrain, which serve both of these counties.

No money for highways

Earlier versions of the regional measure allowed as much as 30% of the measure to be available for highway spending, enough to outweigh any climate benefits generated by additional public transit investments. However, in a big win for Transform and the climate, not only will the measure be climate-positive, but all of the money will be spent on public transit, which will get people out of their cars and onto the bus or train, reducing congestion and greenhouse gas emissions.

What we’re still fighting for

Stable transit funding requires a new tax. From the beginning, Transform has advocated for a progressive revenue mechanism that would generate more funding and require wealthy businesses to pay their fair share. However, SB 63 calls for a sales tax, which will fall most heavily on those least able to afford it. 

The possibility of a citizen initiative

SB 63 contains language to allow a regional funding measure to be placed on the ballot via citizen initiative. A citizen-led initiative has a significant upside: it only needs 50% plus one vote to pass. A measure placed on the ballot by MTC or another elected body requires over two-thirds of voter support.

Getting a citizen initiative on the ballot isn’t easy. Bay Area Forward — a collaboration of transit unions and Voices for Public Transportation Coalition — and our allies would need to collect tens of thousands of signatures, which is an expensive and time-consuming process. However, if we succeeded, this could provide a template for future funding measures, such as a proposed affordable housing measure.

Bay Area transit must keep moving forward 

Bay Area legislators, MTC, and advocates like Transform have been working for several years to save local transit from the fiscal cliff. We’ve secured stopgap funding and an emergency loan from the state while investing significantly in safety, cleanliness, and innovative fare programs like the Clipper BayPass, which has grown ridership by 30%. 

These wins will be lost if we don’t pass a regional measure in 2026. Even if SB 63 doesn’t contain everything Transform could hope for by the time it reaches the governor’s office, we’ll still work hard to see that it passes in 2026. The future of the transit systems that the Bay Area relies on, as well as our economic vitality, access to opportunity, and climate goals, depend on it. 

Profiles in Pride

Bay Area LGBTQIA+ Transportation and Housing Advocates

Pride Month is extra poignant this year as queer and trans communities are under attack from the new regime in Washington. So it’s a good time to lift up some of the LGBTQIA+ community members who have worked toward housing and transportation equity in the Bay Area. 

Harvey Milk (1930–1978)

Harvey Milk, also known as the Mayor of Castro Street, was the first out gay candidate elected to office in California. After three unsuccessful campaigns for San Francisco City Supervisor, in 1976, Mayor George Moscone appointed Milk to the Board of Permit Appeals, making him the first out LGBTQIA+ commissioner in the United States. The following year, in November 1977, Milk won his election to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, using his position to fight against anti-LGBTQIA+ efforts in California. On November 27, 1978, Milk and Mayor Moscone were assassinated by Dan White, a former member of the Board of Supervisors, in City Hall.

Roma Guy

Roma Guy was a founder of several community-based women’s and girl’s organizations such as SF Women’s Building, SF Women Against Rape, The Women’s Foundation, and La Casa de las Madres, a safe haven for women escaping abusive relationships. She served on the Mayor’s Local Homeless Board and the James Hormel LGBTQ Advisory Council for the SF Public Library.  She was appointed Co-Chair, along with the Director of Public Health and Sheriff, to the City/County and Community Jail Replacement Project 2016–2017, to develop alternatives to incarceration.

Whit Joaquin Guerrero

Joaquin Guerrero was the first Director of Our Trans Home SF, a BIPOC-led trans housing program. He led the opening of the first Transgender Navigation Center in the U.S. and helped envision the End Trans Homelessness initiative, the first initiative of its kind for trans and gender nonconforming people. Guerrero also served on the Trans Advisory Committee of the Office of Trans Initiatives and the City and County’s Shelter Monitoring Committee. He is currently a Program Officer for the Arlene and Michael Rosen Foundation, a mediator in supportive housing for the San Francisco Bar Association’s Conflict Intervention Services, and a Capacity Coach for the Transgender Strategy Center.

Megan Rohrer

Megan Rohrer has worked to support unhoused people, including LGBTQIA+ populations, for over two decades. They have worked on homelessness in their native Sioux Falls, SD, San Francisco, and Kona, HI. Since 2022, Rohrer has served on the Local Homeless Coordinating Board, which advises the San Francisco Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing. They also serve as the co-chair of the San Francisco Local Homelessness Coordinating Board.

Courtney Brousseau (1997–2020)

Courtney Brousseau founded Gay for Transit, an LGBTQIA+ group that advocated for better transit in San Francisco. He was also a committed bike rider and bike advocate before he was tragically killed in a drive-by shooting at age 22.

Legislature’s response to the California budget provides a lifeline for transit, invests in housing, and ignores biking and walking

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Zack Deutsch-Gross, [email protected], (415) 637-0101

California legislators have agreed on a budget that prioritizes needed investments in affordable housing and provides a lifeline to Bay Area transit agencies facing fiscal cliffs. However, by prioritizing highways over active transportation, the budget misses a major opportunity to meet the scale of the climate crisis.

The two-party agreement in the legislature invests $500 million in Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC) and $120 million to the Multifamily Housing Program, rejects the Governor’s proposal to cut $1.1 billion from transit programs, and provides Bay Area transit agencies with a $750 million loan to keep buses and trains running as they seek long-term operating funds.

“We applaud the legislature’s commitment to affordable housing and keeping our transit agencies afloat,” said Transform Policy Director Zack Deutsch-Gross. “These vital investments keep the Bay Area on track toward a 2026 regional transportation measure, which depends on the legislature passing SB 63 authorizing legislation later this year.”

However, the proposal fails to address the $400 million cut from California’s Active Transportation Program in last year’s budget. As a result, only 13 of the over 300 project applications to promote safe biking and walking will move forward.

“Instead of shifting dollars toward sustainable transportation alternatives, this proposal continues to fund Caltrans’ highway expansion agenda,” said Deutsch-Gross. “Even in tight budget years, the climate crisis demands more than preserving the status quo.”

While the legislature’s proposal does not mention reauthorizing Cap-and-Trade, now Cap-and-Invest, it does allocate $500 million to CalFIRE from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, limiting GGRF’s ability to support affordable housing, transit, and environmental justice priorities.

###

Transform works to ensure that people of all incomes thrive in a world safe from climate chaos. We envision vibrant neighborhoods, transformed by excellent, sustainable mobility options and affordable housing, where those historically impacted by racist disinvestment now have power and voice.

The Latest from Transform

Stay informed on our work to create more equitable, just, and affordable housing and transportation in California.

Address:
1721 Broadway, Suite 201
Oakland, CA 94612

Get in Touch:
510.740.3150
[email protected]

© 2025 Transform. All rights reserved.